Voice Buddy
Flight Simulator Downloads for sims such as Flight Simulator X, FSX, FS2004, CFS3 and more including Aircraft, Scenery Add-ons and more. We also have Flight Simulation News, Information, reviews and now Aviation news and much more!
Subscribe to the Fly Away Newsletter!
Email address:  
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Your Account  ·  Forums  ·  3D Glasses  ·  Flightsim Downloads  

Site Menu
· Home
· Forums
· Free Flight Simulator
· Flyaway Store
· Flight Simulator X
· CFS3 Downloads
· FS2004 Downloads
· Train Sim Downloads
· Flight Tracking
· Contact the Team
· Content
· Flight Sim Links
· Flight Simulator Downloads
· Free Web Hosting
· Link Exchange!
· Members List
· Private Messages
· Screenshots Gallery
· Statistics
· Stories Archive
· Surveys
· Top 30 Pages
· Topics
· Your Account

Advertising

Fly the 787 Dreamliner


Random Image
Flight Simulator screenshot, click to enlarge
  • Check out the Fly Away Simulation, Flight Simulator #1 Gallery
  • Upload images

  • User Info
    Don't have an account? Register now!
    Login

    Membership:
    Latest: gary-199
    Standby: 526
    Overall: 110111

    People Online:
    Visitors: 188
    Members: 9

    Forums

     refueling boom
     Saitek X52
     What are the best realism settings for the controls?
     cannot get fsx dowloads to work in vista
     ~#~ Aurora / Northern Lights ~#~

    Fly Away Simulation, Flight Simulator #1 Forums


    Support Fly Away

    Donate To us


    It takes lots of hard work and money to keep one of the web's largest Flight Simulation sites running. Your donations are greatly appreciated, donations received will be put back into expanding, improving and paying for Fly Away.

    Vote For Us



    Fly Away Simulation, Flight Simulator #1: Forums

     Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Login to check your private messagesLogin to check your private messages   LoginLogin 

    FSv9.1 and Matrox P650 Card settings


     
    Post new topic   Reply to topic    Fly Away Simulation Forum Index -> Hardware Forum
    View previous topic :: View next topic  
    Author Message
    Ctein
    Guest





    PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:43 am    Post subject: FSv9.1 and Matrox P650 Card settings Reply with quote

    Dear Folks,

    OK, I upgraded my system to a Matrox Millennium P650 AGP card, which has hardware 3D rendering. Dxdiag reports all rendering functions thru DirectX version 9 are working fine and I can run Civ4, which demands hardware 3D and TnL support. But I'm getting wonky results from TnL with FS (both version 9 and 9.1).

    Everything's fine so long as I have the transform and lighting hardware rendering option OFF. I can engage all other high quality settings, even setting everything to ultra-high quality, at any resolution between 600x800 and 1024x1280 (my normal system resolution). But if I engage TnL, the display becomes erratic-to-unusable for all other combinations of settings. Sometimes it works, but usually the exterior render collapses into a non-representational op-art pattern of geometric shapes and lines.

    So, I suppose I have two questions:

    1) How much landscape quality am I really losing by not being able to turn on TnL, given the other settings all work at maximum quality? (I gotta say it looks pretty good outside, even if I don't think the anti-aliasing option makes much difference.)

    2) Anybody got any thoughts on why I'm seeing these TnL problems and if they're fixable? (I haven't asked Matrox about this yet; figured here was the place to start.)

    Thanks!


    pax / Ctein

    ==========================================
    -- Ctein's Online Gallery http://www.ctein.com
    -- Digital Restorations http://photo-repair.com
    ==========================================
    Back to top
    RadarMan
    Chief Captain
    Chief Captain


    Joined: Aug 25, 2003
    Posts: 15317
    Location: U.S.A

    PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 5:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

    You have a 64 bit video card, at the low end for the sim. To be honest I don't think your going to see that much (if any) difference between the two. They are that close together where only a close examination, not a moving "target" would need one over the other. Yes Tri is the one to use but with your specs that's the least of your problems.
    I hope I'm not being too harsh.
    By the way only use anti-aliasing in the control panel of the card, don't have it checked in the settings of the sim
    I thought you'd like to read about both.


    ***************
    trilinear texture filtering
    Like its less sophisticated cousin, bilinear texture filtering, trilinear filtering is a complex technique used by 3D graphics cards to make movement through rendered landscapes realistic even in fast-moving games.

    **************
    bilinear texture filtering
    Bilinear texture filtering enhances a computer's ability to scale 3D graphics in a smoother, more realistic way. With 3D graphics, especially with games, you don't want a graphics card to grab texture maps from memory and simply write them on your computer screen: as the polygons drawn onscreen grew bigger, they would take on a blocky look. To improve the ability to scale 3D graphics, you need to filter them. Bilinear texture filtering does this by averaging the four adjacent texels (the basic elements of a texture map), thus creating a new texel that renders a more subtle, realistic texture.
    **********
    Radar
    _________________
    Back to top
    View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website
    Guest






    PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

    Dear RM,

    Thanks! That saves me a lot of hassle trying to figure out how to configure the thing.

    The Matrox P650 performs better than one might expect. It's 2-3 times more powerful than the G550, which (you'll recall) I found was usable, you just didn't get the really cool visual quality. With the P650 at Flight Simulator's default graphics settings (medium low quality) it's averaging 20 frames per second. At 768 by 1024 resolution and graphics quality turned up to ultra-high everywhere, it still turns out 10 frames per second.

    Now, if I can only find some time to learn how to fly! I've mastered crashing. I'm so proud of myself ...


    pax / Ctein
    [[ Please excuse any word-salad. ViaVoice in training! ]]
    =========================================
    -- Ctein's Online Gallery http://www.ctein.com
    -- Digital Restorations http://photo-repair.com
    =========================================
    Back to top
    RadarMan
    Chief Captain
    Chief Captain


    Joined: Aug 25, 2003
    Posts: 15317
    Location: U.S.A

    PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 7:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

    I remember that older card you had, those specs are impressive with the new one. It sounds like a keeper, I'm glad your not obsessed with maxing out all the sliders.

    Radar
    _________________
    Back to top
    View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website
    Display posts from previous:   
    Post new topic   Reply to topic    Fly Away Simulation Forum Index -> Hardware Forum All times are GMT
    Page 1 of 1

     
    Jump to:  
    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot vote in polls in this forum
    Forums ©
    You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php
    Fly Away Simulation - 2006 © All Rights Reserved
    Privacy | Terms

    Fly Away International
    Fly Away English Fly Away Deutsch Fly Away Simulation Wordpress Blog


    Page Generation: 0.341 Seconds