| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Spoty101
First Officer
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 182
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 10:18 pm Post subject: Really that bad?? |
 |
|
| I am almost finished downloading FSx and is it really that bad as u guys say?? worse than FS9 or r some people exageratin?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SamIntel
Captain
Joined: Mar 28, 2005
Posts: 827
Location: Helena, Montana
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:30 pm Post subject: Re: Really that bad?? |
|
|
| Spoty101 wrote: |
| I am almost finished downloading FSx and is it really that bad as u guys say?? worse than FS9 or r some people exageratin?? |
It is great if you have a computer that can run it. I have:
512 MB memory
256 MB video card
pentium 4, 3 GHz CPU
It runs terribly on my system, looks lousy too. But if you have a really good PC, it would be great.
_________________
I'm not a bad pilot, I just like experimenting a little. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spoty101
First Officer
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 182
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have 2GB ram
256 Mb 16 pipeline graphics card
AMD Athlon 64-bit 3200+ CPU |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
graham05
First Officer
Joined: Oct 01, 2005
Posts: 123
Location: Santa Cruz, CA, 20 miles southwest of ksfo
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Spoty101 wrote: |
I have 2GB ram
256 Mb 16 pipeline graphics card
AMD Athlon 64-bit 3200+ CPU |
I think it is better then fs2004. plus they said that they were not done with it in the manual.
I have a 64 mb video card, a AMD Athlon 64-bit 3200+ CPU, and 448 ram and I got with everything on full 5-25 FPS. you should have a more then i do. 
And what is good FPS to you guys 
Graham |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mypilot
Chief Captain
Joined: Nov 26, 2004
Posts: 1955
Location: Long Beach, California KLGB/KTOA
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you have an average computer, i don't think there is any point in getting FSX because you'd have to lower your settings to 50% to get descent frame rates and at that point, you could run FS9 with settings at 90%.
_________________
[URL]www.myspace.com/soapeyshope[\URL] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WantFSX
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I got 10-20FPS on the ground with all the sliders maxed. Then it moved to 20-30 when I got higher. I have a 3.2ghz dual core....256mb ati radeon x600...4gb of ram. It'll have higher frame rates when it comes out in October...I hope  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WantFSX
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Check this out...I turned the water effects off or down and I was getting 60-115fps!!!!
 Click Picture to look closer
(This is with all the sliders maxed and the water effects off)[/b] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WantFSX
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, here's one with all the sliders maxed and with the Water Settings on Maximum 2x. I dont know how Im getting these FPS!!!!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Faucett
Captain
Joined: May 03, 2006
Posts: 828
Location: Missouri, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good work, WantFSX.
I think as just a little time passes, we are beginning to see how everyone's system is reacting to fsx, and one thing is clear: you can do a lot with the settings, but a good machine will be required to achieve what we've been seeing in the dev's screenshots and movies.
A lot of people freaked out initially, but they were trying to run max settings on crap machines.
imho
_________________
Radio K.A.O.S. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spoty101
First Officer
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 182
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wait a sec if somebody else can put sliders maxed and get smoth gameplay andhave a computer similar to mine how come mine lags horribly when I put everything on max? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spoty101
First Officer
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 182
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WOW NVM I PUT ALL THE SETTING ON ULTRA HIGH AND GAME RUNS SMOTHLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I"LL GET A PICTURE AS SOON AS I FISNISH PLAYING!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I get 20-30 frames per second on default settings.. I got a AMD athlon 64 3500 at 2.2GHz, 1GB ram and a 128mb ATI Radeon Xpress 200. If i have all settings maxed out i could only get 2-5 frames per second  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spoty101
First Officer
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 182
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have everything maxed out except traffic and I get 45 FPS if I max out ground trafic those little cars my computer will lag horribly |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WantFSX
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Spoty101 wrote: |
| I have everything maxed out except traffic and I get 45 FPS if I max out ground trafic those little cars my computer will lag horribly |
Hmmm, thats cool....what kind of system do you have? Is it just me or do most of the cars not have bodies?...they just have the bottom and the wheels. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spoty101
First Officer
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 182
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WantFSX wrote: |
| Spoty101 wrote: |
| I have everything maxed out except traffic and I get 45 FPS if I max out ground trafic those little cars my computer will lag horribly |
Hmmm, thats cool....what kind of system do you have? Is it just me or do most of the cars not have bodies?...they just have the bottom and the wheels. |
I have an
ASUS A8N-SLI DELUXE MOTHERBOARD
AMD ATHLON 64-BIT 3200+ (2.01GHz)
256MB ATI x800 Graphics card
2GB of ram
16X DVD (doesnt apply to demo)
120GB hard drive
and yes i'v noticed most cars have no body just wheel and axel ur not the only one |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum FAQ
Search
Profile
Login to check your private messages
Login
