 |
Site Menu |
 |
| |
|
 |
Advertising |
 |
| |
|
 |
Random Image |
 |
| |
|
 |
User Info |
 |
| |
|
 |
Forums |
 |
| |
|
 |
Support Fly Away |
 |
| |
|
| |
|
Fly Away Simulation, Flight Simulator #1: Forums |
|
My New ATI RADEON 9800PRO 128MB
Goto page 1, 2 Next
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 15243 Location: U.S.A
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:23 am Post subject: My New ATI RADEON 9800PRO 128MB |
|
|
Ok, my new card (ATI RADEON 9800PRO 128MB) came today (fast delivery). From the time it arrived to the time it was installed took 45 minutes.
The difference is nothing short of amazing.
With everything turned up full I got 6.8 FPS when flying my DC3. Now with the new card and the 4.3 drivers I get a whopping 18.9 FPS and possible more. I have a stop at 19 FPS which I have to go in and change.
I'll report some other differences as I notice them
I have ordered but not yet received Ultimate Traffic, my computer can handle it now my Video card can also.
Simple job:
I downloaded the new 4.3 drivers (and control panel) to a folder on the desktop.
I first deleted all the ATI drivers on my system from the old card.
I then went into the device manager and deleted the old card.
I did not reboot but I did shut down the computer.
I uninstalled the old card and installed the new card (cool built in fan).
I rebooted but did not let the new (built-in) drivers install themselves.
I now used the new drivers that were in the desktop folder, installed the rebooted and was off to the races.
It worked like a charm, beautiful,no problems.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
harleyman First Officer


Joined: Feb 23, 2004 Posts: 195 Location: Statesville NC
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cool....Lucky dog.......Wish it was that easy for me....HeHe...lol But then again,we all know I'm a stupid puter person.......
So glad it went well for you.......
Happy flying.........Mason.......Gotta go fly now.....see Ya.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geordan Guest

|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice!
May I ask what resolution and AA fliltering level you're running?
I get average 30-35 on my fx 5900 with 4x AA at 1024 x 768 and maximum settings. over a big city with lots of clouds in the sky it drops to about 22 but nothing too horrid.
-Geordan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 15243 Location: U.S.A
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Right now I'm maxed (graphically) out and running 1024x768x32 and haven't played with the anti-aliasing as of yet.
I see where the night flying eats up the fps more than day, I usually don't care for night flying, except to see the sights in Las Vegas.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rambunctious First Officer


Joined: Mar 29, 2003 Posts: 111 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey there, I'm glad you're enjoying your new card!
Could someone explain how you measure the framerate while you're playing the game? Is there a freeware utility for this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 15243 Location: U.S.A
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rambunctious wrote: |
Hey there, I'm glad you're enjoying your new card!
Could someone explain how you measure the framerate while you're playing the game? Is there a freeware utility for this? |
After you chose your aircraft and it's sitting on the runway, press -Shift then-Z and do it 2 or 3 times until you get 2 lines of red figures at the top of the screen.
They will show you your frame-rates, speed, heading, altitude etc. It isn't beautiful looking but it does have quite a bit of information.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rambunctious First Officer


Joined: Mar 29, 2003 Posts: 111 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks, R |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flyaway Site Admin


Joined: Jun 28, 2003 Posts: 947 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RadarMan, whats the technical on the 9800 Pro? Does she outrun the FX5900 from Nvidia? _________________ Fly Away Simulation, Flight Sim #1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 15243 Location: U.S.A
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geordan Guest

|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah the 9800 is substantially faster.
The fx 5900 is on par with the 9700 and the 9800 is usually 10 percent faster than the 9700. The 9800 processes high level filtering significantly better than both though. This round of cards, ati has a lead in both overall speed, as well as filtering quality.
-Geordan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 15243 Location: U.S.A
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Geordan wrote: |
Nice!
May I ask what resolution and AA fliltering level you're running?
I get average 30-35 on my fx 5900 with 4x AA at 1024 x 768 and maximum settings. over a big city with lots of clouds in the sky it drops to about 22 but nothing too horrid.
-Geordan |
You asked the other day about my settings and I wasn't ready to play around with them. These are the "final" settings that I arrived at.
I noticed that my FPS has increases 4 fold since I initiated these two new settings, faaaannnnntastic!
Anti-Aliasing 4x
Anisotropic Filtering 8x
http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030306/radeon9800pro-29.html
Again it's 1024x768x32. I could set it higher but this is what I've always used. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geordan Guest

|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bitchin'
-Geordan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest

|
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Greetings! Congrats on the 9800Pro, aweseme card. I have one and I'm getting a constant 20-25fps at 1280x1024x32 with some AA and AF on. I'm limited by my processor which is a P4 1.8. Anyways, enough with the technobabble.. I have a question. When you're flying, do things in the distance (on the ground, buildings, fields, etc.) kinda "blur and wiggle"? It's kinda hard to describe what it's doing, it just looks really weird. It's kinda like the moire effect, only different. One other thing I notice is that when I'm in virtual cockpit mode (regardless of aircraft) when I turn my "head" from left to right, it takes a second to fill in the texture on the ground so I have these big blocks of blank color, then the texture fills in. Other than the two problems I listed above, I have no issues what-so-ever and things look incredible. I had never noticed these issues with my old GeForce2.
Thanks in advance!
One other thing, what kind of processor are you running RadarMan? Just curious... You should be able to get some more out of that card easily if you're running a decent processor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 15243 Location: U.S.A
|
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: |
Greetings! Congrats on the 9800Pro, aweseme card. I have one and I'm getting a constant 20-25fps at 1280x1024x32 with some AA and AF on. I'm limited by my processor which is a P4 1.8. Anyways, enough with the technobabble.. I have a question. When you're flying, do things in the distance (on the ground, buildings, fields, etc.) kinda "blur and wiggle"? It's kinda hard to describe what it's doing, it just looks really weird. It's kinda like the moire effect, only different. One other thing I notice is that when I'm in virtual cockpit mode (regardless of aircraft) when I turn my "head" from left to right, it takes a second to fill in the texture on the ground so I have these big blocks of blank color, then the texture fills in. Other than the two problems I listed above, I have no issues what-so-ever and things look incredible. I had never noticed these issues with my old GeForce2.
Thanks in advance!
One other thing, what kind of processor are you running RadarMan? Just curious... You should be able to get some more out of that card easily if you're running a decent processor. |
Surprisingly enough I have a 2½ year old P-4 1.5gig with 512mb Rambus. I know just what you mean. I call the distance "shimmering", the buildings are crystal clear below and to the side but the far distance has that "look".
Nothing "fills in'" after a period of time as you say, maybe because I'm using the latest drivers, who can figure sometimes, the subtle differences can be attributed to anything.
All I know that it is a vast improvement over the old.
Did you download the latest DirectX and SP1, that may help.
By the way SP2 for WXP-Home is in beta, we may see some improvements there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest

|
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, I'm current on everything except Cat. 4.3 and that is by choice. I'm using Omega 4.2 Drivers for the vid card. I tried the 4.3's and the Omega 4.2's seem better. I'm at SP1... don't know anything else to do.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| |
|
Fly Away International

Page Generation: 0.308 Seconds
|
|